Scribemen Magazine

Democrat’s Attempt To Label JD Vance As Weird. They’re Wrong.

4–6 minutes
2024 REPUBLICAN VICE PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE JD VANCE (PHOTO CREDITS: ANNA MONEYMAKER/GETTY IMAGES).

By: Matthew Polyak

After being chosen as the Republican Vice Presidential nominee, Democrats and the mainstream media (who are now not even willing to hide their political biases) have tried to paint JD Vance as “weird” for his actions and political beliefs. However, as we will examine, these attacks on Vance are inherently, quite weird.

Well, where did this strong label even come from?

It began to circulate online after a video was unearthed from 2021 where JD Vance joined then-Fox News host Tucker Carlson for an interview.

While discussing the higher political elite, Vance referred to Democrat higher-ups as “a bunch of childless cat ladies who are miserable at their own lives and the choices that they’ve made and so they want to make the rest of the country miserable, too.”

He continued.

“It’s just a basic fact — you look at Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, AOC — the entire future of the Democrats is controlled by people without children… And how does it make any sense that we’ve turned our country over to people who don’t really have a direct stake in it?”

Poor choice of words? Maybe. However, his main point is 100 percent correct. How can a society prosper, let alone survive, if it isn’t bearing children? To say otherwise would simply be illogical. Medicinal, technological and societal advancements all rely on a rising birth rate.

Vance is also correct in pointing out that people who don’t have children have different views on various things, such as the future of the country. For example, someone who is 42, single, and parties every weekend versus someone who is 30, married, and has kids may not agree on how society ought to be run.

Of course those who don’t have kids don’t have a stake in the country’s future, because as mentioned above, a country can only thrive when its citizens are having children. There is and should be nothing wrong nor controversial with this statement.

Ben Shapiro, editor-emeritus for the Daily Wire and host of ‘The Ben Shapiro Show’ worded this best in his column:

“What is actually weird is believing that the choice of having children versus the choice of not having children are morally equivalent. They are not. Or that those choices are societally equivalent in terms of their benefit to society. They are not.

All functioning societies are rooted in a traditional family structure that is built around having kids.

That is utterly uncontroversial, as proven by our priors. Every society is rooted in the little platoons represented by families, and those families have to be built for the future — or the society doesn’t have a future.

The alternative perspective, which believes that all personal choice is not a matter of social impact or morality, is a peculiarly Western-educated, post-Christian idea.

And that’s weird.”

So, why are the media and Democrats painting JD Vance as weird?

Well, it’s because those who paint Vance as weird, are indeed, weird.

For example, a report by The Daily Caller says that CNN and MSNBC referred to JD Vance as “weird” over 160 times on monday alone, which is quite bizarre.

On top of that, take Democratic Presidential nominee Kamala Harris–who often cackles weirdly, says sentences that don’t make sense, and is extremely radical on policy.

According to the Associated Press, Harris used this phrase during a fundraiser, saying that former President Trump’s “wild lies about my record and some of what he and his running mate are saying, it is just plain weird.” 

She continued.

“I mean that’s the box you put that in, right?”

The media will label you as a racist and a sexist for calling her, quite justly, weird. However, it is perfectly okay to label a United States Senator as weird.

This is the same Senator who served in the Marine Corps, graduated from Yale Law School with a Juris Doctor, and has 2 children with his Indian-American wife.

Once again, the media are lying to you.

But are JD Vance’s policies weird? Nope. They are (not shockingly), quite normal: 

Let’s put this next to Kamala Harris’ policies:

To me, it seems like the weird one here, clearly, is Kamala Harris and the radical Democrats.

The legacy media and Democrats can try their hardest to attempt to paint Vance as weird–but it won’t help their electoral efforts.

The fact of the matter is that this smear campaign won’t get Harris elected. The economy is riddled with high prices and inflation. People can’t afford gas, groceries, and much more. 

It simply is not a winning proposition and everyday Americans aren’t buying into this ridiculous notion that voting for Donald Trump and JD Vance is bad because some democratic elitists called them “weird.”

Maybe the people who are calling a normal father from Ohio weird, are themselves, what they label others.

Sources:

Trending